Lyntra’s cover photo
Lyntra

Lyntra

Engineering Services

Gold Coast, Queesland 67 followers

Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

About us

Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future At Lyntra, we specialize in delivering complex biobased carbon removal facilities. Our mission is to bridge the gap between innovative bio-processing technologies and successful project execution, helping businesses turn visionary climate solutions into operational reality. The global push for decarbonization and a circular economy is creating a new demand for expert engineering and project management in the biomass sector. We provide the deep, specialized expertise needed to navigate the challenges of advanced thermal conversion systems like pyrolysis, gasification, and advanced anaerobic digestion. Our focus is on mitigating technical risks and optimizing plant efficiency to ensure robust, high-quality solutions with maximum carbon removal impact. We offer flexible, senior-level support designed to integrate seamlessly with your team: Fractional Engineering Support: Access expert capabilities in bio-processing and thermal conversion systems, from concept design and detailed engineering to technology validation and commissioning. Owner’s Representation & Project Oversight: We serve as your dedicated advocate, meticulously managing every stage of your project to ensure it stays on track, within budget, and aligned with your strategic goals. Our rigorous approach to risk control and stakeholder management empowers swift decision-making and smooth execution. Whether you're developing a novel biochar production facility or scaling up a gasification plant, we provide the strategic oversight and technical execution required to succeed. We handle the complexities so you can focus on your core business, knowing your carbon-negative project is in expert hands. Let's discuss how we can support your next

Website
www.lyntra.com.au
Industry
Engineering Services
Company size
2-10 employees
Headquarters
Gold Coast, Queesland
Type
Privately Held
Specialties
Project Management, Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Reneable Energy, and Recycling

Locations

Employees at Lyntra

Updates

  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    GHG reduction of preprocessing biomass (2/2) Following up on my last post, let's dive into the "why" behind the 65% reduction in GHG emissions. Here's why wet milling makes the dryer so much more efficient: - Homogeneous Biomass: Wet milling prior to drying creates a more uniform biomass particle size. This consistency allows for a more optimized dryer design and settings, as the feedstock is no longer highly variable. A consistent feedstock means less energy is wasted on compensating for large, dense chunks of biomass mixed with fine particles. - Increased Surface Area: Milling the product prior to the dryer also dramatically increases the surface area-to-volume ratio. This provides more surface area for drying to occur, which improves heat and mass transfer. Think of it like drying a sponge, if you tear it into smaller pieces, it dries much faster because more of its internal structure is exposed to the air. - Reduced Drying Time: With the increased surface area, heat is able to reach the core of each particle faster, significantly reducing the overall drying time required. This accelerated process allows for higher throughput and less energy consumption per unit of biomass processed. - More Accessible Water: Wet milling means more of the internal, water-holding pores of the biomass are exposed, making the moisture easier to access and remove during the drying process. This is especially true for lignocellulosic biomass, where water can be trapped within the complex fibrous structure. - Reduced Product Loss: By cutting the biomass whilst it's still wet, we reduce the likelihood of generating fines. These tiny, problematic particles can be lost during handling and transport, reducing overall product throughput. The reduced loss in product drastically decreases the GHG emissions per ton of prepared biomass, as you are not expending energy to process material that never makes it to the final unit. - Impurity Removal: The liquid medium used in wet milling helps to remove undesirable ash and alkali metals that can interfere with the pyrolysis reaction and degrade the quality of the final bio-oil. The removal of these impurities can also reduce equipment fouling and corrosion downstream, extending the life of your equipment. By optimising at the front end, you can drastically improve the performance of your entire pyrolysis unit. But like we said in the last post, it's not as simple and straightforward as this. Milling prior to drying has its disadvantages as well: - Increased energy consumption for the milling itself, - Potentially a reduced throughput rate as mositure can allow product to slip through the teeth, offsetting gains from reduced fines, and - Downtime increases for cleaning and unclogging equipment. It's all about selecting the best process for your feedstock and goals. If you'd like to explore how these efficiencies could work for your specific system, let's connect. Lyntra. #Biomass #Pyrolysis #Lyntra

    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    GHG reduction of preprocessing biomass (1/2) Optimising biomass preprocessing is a critical first step to unlocking the full potential of a pyrolysis unit. Today we are looking at a new study that looks into the GHG impact of wet and dry milling, the results quite interesting. 🧐 A recent study by Ou et al. (2023), conducted by the Feedstock Conversion Interface Consortium (FCIC) and funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, provides interesting insights. The analysis compared the conventional dry milling process with a wet milling system for forest residues. While the study assumed different unit designs for each process and we aren't told what unit is used where, the outcomes are intriguing. The study found that using wet milling for preprocessing resulted in a massive 65% reduction in life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per ton of conversion-ready feedstock compared to dry milling. The bulk of the reduced GHG emissions comes from the reduced energy to dry the product, we'll go into why this is the case in a follow up post, as well as a reduced amount of loss product. Based on the documented energy savings, an overall reduction in operational expenditure (OPEX) is also a clear implication. A financial model wasn't part of this initial study, but we will go over a similar study that includes the economics in the near future. However, it's not all straightforward. The slurry-like nature of wet-milled biomass can increase the risk of issues like clogging and bridging, making material handling more difficult and potentially leading to increased downtime that could offset these gains. Success is highly system-specific. This is where expertise comes in. If you'd like a copy of the study, reach out or comment below, and I'll send it over. For anyone navigating the complexities of biomass preprocessing for pyrolysis, Lyntra is here to help. We are passionate about helping you design, engineer, and optimise your systems to achieve a better yield and a lower environmental footprint. Let's work together to build a more sustainable future for bioenergy. Thanks to Michael Perry at FOREST CONCEPTS for sending this study over to me. #Biomass #Pyrolysis #Bioenergy #WetMilling #CleanEnergy #Lyntra #Sustainability #Engineering #Processing #RenewableEnergy #Innovation #Biofuels #ClimateAction #GreenTechnology

    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    The Biomass Pyrolysis Operator's Tar Troubleshooting Matrix Building on our last post about the three root causes of tar, this week we're diving into the "how-to." Tar isn't a single problem; it's a symptom. The real challenge is finding its source. So today I thought I would share a tar troubleshooting guide aimed at the operator, that moves from initial data analysis to in-depth chemical diagnostics. It's a systematic approach to help you diagnose and solve tar-related issues helping to reduce headaches. I've converted this entire guide into a downloadable spreadsheet that you can use to diagnose your own reactor. If you'd like a free copy, please comment "Matrix" below If you are having troubles with Tar, reach out, we'd love to help. Lyntra

    • Biomass opeator's tar trouble shooting matrix
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    The Operator's Guide to Tar: Troubleshooting in a Live Reactor This guide breaks down common tar problems into three categories for effective diagnosis and solutions. 1. 🍃 Feedstock Consistency: The Process Foundation An unstable feedstock is the most common cause of tar issues. A reactor is a finely tuned system, and any variation in inputs leads to an unpredictable output. - Inconsistent Moisture: Too much moisture cools the reactor, causing condensation. Too little can reduce steam reforming effectiveness. - Varying Particle Size: A wide range of sizes causes uneven heating. Smaller particles pyrolyze quickly while larger ones remain partially processed, creating difficult-to-manage tars. - Contamination: Foreign materials like dirt or rocks introduce minerals that catalyze the formation of heavier, problematic tars. On-the-Ground Solution: Implement strict feedstock quality control. Use a consistent source, and ensure proper screening and sizing. 2. 🔧 Reactor Integrity & Operations: Equipment Checkup Even with perfect feedstock, problems can arise from the reactor itself, often related to equipment condition or operating parameters. - Incorrect Temperature: Tar formation and cracking are highly temperature-dependent. Cold spots from degraded insulation or an overall low operating temperature can cause tar condensation or incomplete cracking. - Insufficient Gas Residence Time: Volatile gases need time in the hot zone for steam reforming and cracking. If the gas moves too quickly, these reactions are incomplete, and more tar exits the reactor. - Coke Build-Up & Catalyst Deactivation: Coke on reactor walls is a sticky surface for tars, accelerating fouling and blockages. A deactivated catalyst is also less effective at breaking down tars. - Faulty Equipment: A worn auger disrupts flow, a broken sensor gives false readings, and a worn seal can cause oxygen ingress. On-the-Ground Solution: Regularly inspect insulation, monitor sensors, and clean coke deposits. Adjust feed rate to increase gas residence time and check for faulty components. 3. 🔥 Oxygen Ingress: The Silent Destroyer Even small amounts of oxygen turn a thermal process into partial oxidation, with disastrous consequences for tar formation. - Faulty Seals/Leaks: Worn seals on access ports, valves, or flanges are common entry points. - Inlet/Outlet Issues: Improperly sealed feed inlets or product outlets can draw in air. On-the-Ground Solution: Conduct regular maintenance on all seals and connections. For systems under negative pressure, a simple smoke test can reveal leaks. What specific operating parameters or on-the-ground fixes have you found most effective? Share your insights below! If you're having tar issues, reach out—I’d love to help. Lyntra #pyrolysis #biomass #Biochar #gasification #renewableenergy #sustainability #cleantech

    • Pyrolysis operator
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    The Tar's Demise: Diving Deeper into Steam Reforming Last week, we unmasked tar as a complex mixture of molecular nightmares. Today, we're diving into the core chemistry of steam reforming, revealing the intricate processes that clean up your syngas and optimize your pyrolysis process. Steam is not a bystander but a critical reactant. At high temperatures, the steam (H2O) molecules become highly reactive, attacking the bonds within tar to deconstruct them. The reforming of tar is not a single reaction but a complex series of pathways that depend on the specific tar compounds present. The reactions involve breaking robust carbon-carbon (C−C) and carbon-oxygen (C−O) bonds, which is why they are highly endothermic and require significant thermal energy. 1. Decomposition of Primary Tars: Primary tars are often oxygenated compounds like phenols, furans, and ketones. Steam initiates a process of hydrolysis, where it cleaves the C-O bonds and strips oxygen from these molecules. This initial reaction is often the fastest and least energy-intensive reforming pathway, transforming these compounds into smaller hydrocarbons and syngas components. For example, a simplified reaction for phenol reforming is: C6H5OH + 11H2O ↔ 14H2 + 6CO2 2. Reforming of Aromatic Tars: This is the more challenging part. The secondary and tertiary tars, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), possess stable ring structures that are highly resistant to breakdown. Reforming these molecules requires higher temperatures and is a multi-step process. Steam first interacts with these rings, leading to dehydrogenation and ring-opening, followed by the reaction of the resulting smaller fragments with more steam. This is where the presence of a catalyst becomes particularly important, as it lowers the activation energy and provides a surface for these difficult reactions to occur. 3. The Water-Gas Shift Reaction (WGS): Running in parallel to the reforming reactions is the crucial WGS equilibrium: CO+H2O ↔ CO2+H2 This reaction is a key tool for syngas quality control. It directly impacts the final H2/CO ratio. By consuming CO and producing more H2, it can dramatically increase the value of your syngas for downstream applications like Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The direction and speed of this reaction are influenced by temperature and the residence time of the gases in the reactor. The success of these reactions hinges on more than just the presence of steam. The reactions are governed by a delicate balance of thermodynamics and kinetics. While in-situ steam reforming is a cornerstone, it is not the entire solution. Over the next couple of weeks will explore how to handle tar whether you are in the design and planning phase or are actively operating a reactor. What specific operating parameters have you found most effective for balancing the kinetics and thermodynamics of steam reforming in your work? Share your insights below! Lyntra

    • Biomass Pyrolysis Reactor In-Situ Steam Reforming
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    The Tar Story: From Biomass Polymers to Molecular Nightmares Last week, we explored how in-situ steam acts as a hero in biomass pyrolysis by reforming tars. But what exactly is this "tar" we are trying to reform? The common misconception is that tar is a single, uniform substance. In reality, it's a complex and diverse mixture of hundreds of different organic compounds that are an unavoidable byproduct of biomass depolymerization. The key to effective pyrolysis isn't to eliminate tar completely but to understand its formation pathways and manage it. The process begins inside the biomass particle itself. As the biomass is heated, its main components, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, thermally decompose. This is not a single reaction, but a series of complex pathways that yield different products. These radicals initiate follow-on reactions that lead directly to the formation of primary tars. Key among these are free radicals, which initiate follow-on reactions that lead directly to the formation of primary tars. If left unchecked, these tars can undergo secondary reactions as they travel through the hot reactor, leading to repolymerization, condensation, and dehydrogenation. This is where the more problematic, high-molecular-weight tars like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are formed. If given even more time, these PAHs can continue to grow into even larger, more complex molecules. The Three Stages of Tar Here’s a breakdown of the three types of tars and their practical impact on your process: - Primary Tars: These are formed directly from the depolymerization of biomass. They are generally oxygenated compounds like furans and phenols. - Secondary Tars: These are formed from the cracking and repolymerization of primary tars. These include lighter aromatic hydrocarbons like benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX), as well as the more problematic PAHs - Tertiary Tars: These are the heavy, highly stable PAHs that are prone to solidifying and fouling equipment. They are the primary cause of downtime and increased maintenance costs in a pyrolysis reactor. The Feedstock Connection The type of tar you get is heavily influenced by your feedstock: - Cellulose and Hemicellulose-Rich Feedstocks: These tend to produce more oxygenated and lighter primary tars. - Lignin-Rich Feedstocks: These will yield a higher amount of phenols and other aromatic compounds, which are the building blocks of the problematic heavy tars. - Tars will always form no matter how well the process is controlled. This is why we need a strategy to handle them and reduce the likelihood that they will transform into heavier, more difficult tars. Next week, we'll dive into the specific strategies we can use to break down these tars, focusing on how steam reforming turns these molecular nightmares into a valuable, high-quality syngas. What is a key lesson you've learned about the chemical breakdown of tars in your own work? Share your thoughts below!

    • Biomass pyrolysis tar formation images from Horvat, Alen. (2016). A study of the uncertainty associated with tar measurement and an investigation of tar evolution and composition during the air-blown fluidised bed gasification of torrefied and non-torrefied grassy biomass.
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    The Pyrolysis Steam Story: From Dehydration to Reforming Last time, we revealed how biomass makes its own water during chemical dehydration. But that's not the end of the story for that steam. It becomes a key player in in-reactor steam reforming reactions, shaping your final product mix and process efficiency. So, what is steam reforming and why is it so critical? Simply put, steam reforming is the high-temperature reaction of steam with volatile organic compounds—specifically tars and light hydrocarbons—to produce a cleaner syngas. It's a powerful tool for process control, but its use is a delicate balancing act. Here's why: - Tar Reduction: This is its most significant role. Heavy tars, which can clog equipment and foul catalysts, are cracked into smaller molecules by the steam. - Syngas Quality: Steam reforming dramatically impacts syngas composition. It promotes the water-gas shift reaction, which increases the valuable hydrogen (H2) content. However, this often comes at the expense of carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH4), which can reduce the overall heating value of your syngas. This is where moisture content is key. The amount of water in your feedstock is not just a liability; it is the genesis of this chemical story. - Too much moisture and the excess energy needed for evaporation and the endothermic reforming reactions can make your process uneconomical. This high moisture can also lead to the formation of undesirable, heavy tars that are more prone to deposition. - Too little moisture, and you may have insufficient steam for effective reforming, leading to higher overall tar production, reactor clogging, and a lower-quality syngas. This is why there is a crucial optimal moisture content window. Within this window, the moisture provides just enough in-situ steam to assist in tar cracking and produce a balanced, high-value syngas without crippling your process's energy balance. The effectiveness of this process is also dictated by several critical factors: - Temperature Dependence: Reforming reactions are highly endothermic and require high temperatures to proceed effectively. - Catalysts: The presence of catalysts can dramatically lower the required temperature and improve reaction efficiency. - Gas Residence Time: The average time a gas molecule spends in the reactor's hot zone is crucial for allowing these reactions to occur. Ultimately, this is a story of economics and operational utilisation as much as it is of chemistry. Whether you're a small operator looking to reduce downtime and improve efficiency, or a large organisation aiming to open new high-value markets by turning hydrogen-rich syngas into advanced liquid fuels via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, optimising these chemical pathways allows us to unlock the full economic potential of biomass. Have you found certain catalysts or operating parameters to be particularly effective in optimizing steam reforming? Share your insights and experiences below!

    • Steam reforming in a biomass pyrolysis reactor
  • Taking another step into the complex world of biomass drying

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    Beyond just "drying," what happens when biomass creates its own water during pyrolysis? Last week, we discussed the nuances of moisture content and its impact on heat transfer. This week, let's peel back another layer and dive into chemical dehydration, a fascinating but often overlooked transformation that profoundly shapes your bio-oil, biochar, and syngas. Imagine your biomass feedstock as a complex molecular puzzle. During physical drying, we're simply removing the water molecules sitting on its surface or trapped in its pores. But as we ramp up the temperature, say above 150°C, the biomass itself starts to reconfigure. This is where chemical dehydration comes in: it's the process where water molecules are formed and then released from within the biomass's molecular structure. Essentially, hydrogen and oxygen atoms from neighboring hydroxyl (-OH) groups (alcohol-like bits abundant in plant matter) combine, chemically bonding to create a molecule of water, which then escapes as vapor. Why is this subtle chemical process so critical for your thermal conversion operations? - Tar Formation & Quality: Chemical dehydration significantly influences the pathways that lead to different tar compounds. This can impact everything from your bio-oil's viscosity to its energy density. - Reaction Kinetics & Product Distribution: The removal of these hydroxyl groups, and the subsequent "holes" left in the biomass structure, can kickstart or accelerate other critical pyrolysis reactions. This directly affects your char yield, gas composition, and the overall efficiency of your process. - Energy Balance Re-evaluation: While not latent heat, these reactions can be endothermic, adding another layer of complexity to your process's energy profile. Understanding this intricate chemical dimension of dehydration is crucial for truly optimizing biomass pyrolysis. It allows us to move beyond simply managing "wetness" and delve into controlling the intrinsic chemical pathways that dictate our product yields and qualities. This chemical transformation isn't just theory; it has tangible impacts on everything from the types of bio-oil components produced to the stability of your char. It's a key part of the biomass pyrolysis story we're continuing to unravel. Next time, we'll explore how these newly formed water molecules, along with any residual moisture, play a role in steam reforming reactions within your reactor – another critical aspect often overlooked! What analytical techniques or operational strategies have you found most effective for understanding or managing chemical dehydration in your biomass thermal processes? Share your insights and experiences below! #BiomassPyrolysis #ChemicalEngineering #Bioenergy #RenewableEnergy #ChemicalDehydration #ThermalConversion #SustainableFuels #MoistureContent

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Lyntra reposted this

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    In biomass pyrolysis, the energy story begins with its moisture content. Last week, we discussed how "just dry it more" isn't a magic bullet for biomass pyrolysis. Many of you shared valuable insights on optimising moisture content (MC), thanks for that. This week, let's peel back a layer into one aspect of why MC is so critical, how it impacts heat transfer during the drying phase. We’ll go into the others in later posts. When we heat biomass from room temperature up to around 150°C, it enters the crucial drying phase. This isn't just simple evaporation; it's a profound heat transfer event that sets the initial energy balance of your entire pyrolysis process. Biomass contains different "types" of water: Free Water: This water, often from direct contact like rain, fills the macroscopic pores and sits on the surface. It's the easiest to remove, held primarily by water molecules bonding with each other and sometimes by capillary forces within the larger pores. Tightly Held (Bound) Water: This water is far more stubborn. It's linked directly to the biomass structure by strong hydrogen bonds with the abundant hydroxyl (-OH) groups found within the polymers. Water can also be held within very small, microscopic pores by strong capillary forces. Removing all this water consumes a substantial amount of heat, known as latent heat of vaporization. Until most of this water is gone, the biomass temperature largely remains at a temperature plateau around 100°C. All of the incoming heat energy is being absorbed by the water to break those hydrogen bonds and convert from liquid to vapor. If we have a MC that's higher than normal the energy-intensive plateau increases, delaying the onset of actual pyrolysis reactions. A MC that's lower than normal and we increase vapor and solid residence times. What dictates how much tightly-held water biomass contains? It largely comes down to its chemical composition and the accessibility of those hydroxyl groups: Hemicellulose: Highly amorphous and rich in accessible hydroxyls, hemicellulose excels at binding water. Biomass high in hemicellulose (e.g., agricultural residues) tends to be more hygroscopic. Cellulose: Despite abundant hydroxyls, cellulose's crystalline structure limits external water binding. Amorphous regions still hold significant water. Lignin: More hydrophobic due to its aromatic structure and fewer accessible hydroxyls. Biomass with higher lignin content (e.g., woody biomass) generally holds less tightly-bound water. So, a 10% biomass moisture content includes both free and tightly-bound water. Understanding these molecular interactions, capillary forces, and inherent water-holding capacities of different biomass types helps to improve our approach to feedstock management. Effective pyrolysis isn't just simple drying, but nuanced control of energy and chemistry from the very first stages. What other "molecular-level" insights have impacted your process optimization? Share your thoughts below!

    • Graph of heat of vaporization, temperature on the y axis and energy on the x axis. It shows the temperature as more energy is imputted, and the different phases
    • An image showing hemicellulose, lignin, and cellulose, hydgrogen bonded with water molecules
  • There's more to feedstock moisture content than "just dry it more". If you're having troubles optimising your product, reach out, we'd love to help you make an impact. #Lyntra

    View profile for Travis Mays

    Founder & MD @ Lyntra | Strategic Engineering & Project Management for a Carbon-Negative Future

    "Just dry it more" isn't the magic solution everyone thinks it is for biomass pyrolysis. I was reading through some recent research on biomass thermal process optimisation, and it reminded me of a conversation I had last week. They were frustrated because their biochar yields were inconsistent, and their first instinct was to "just dry the feedstock more." But moisture content is more nuanced than that. Biomass pyrolysis / gasification typically requires moisture content management as a key parameter, not just minimisation. Here's what I've learned for pyrolysis from recent projects and research: Too dry (below 5%): - Dust generation becomes a real safety hazard - You lose the beneficial steam reformation reactions that actually help crack tars - Rapid heating can cause thermal shock and particle breakdown - Higher fire and explosion risks during handling Too wet (above 20%): - Massive energy penalty heating all that water before you get to actual pyrolysis - Steam interferes with the pyrolysis reactions themselves - Material handling becomes difficult, chances of bridging are increased and the angle of repose can be changed - Temperature control becomes nearly impossible - Product quality suffers dramatically The optimised zone (5-15%): - Steam assists with tar cracking and improves syngas quality - Consistent thermal profiles throughout your reactor - Optimal energy efficiency for the overall process - Better product consistency across biochar, syngas, and bio-oil What's particularly interesting is how this applies across different thermal processes. Whether you're running pyrolysis, gasification, or even the thermal phases of anaerobic digestion, each has its optimal moisture window. The above numbers are just rules of thumb, they change depending on your process, feedstock, and desired product mix and specs. The key insight? Moisture content isn't just about drying, it's about optimisation. Sometimes you need to add moisture, sometimes remove it, but always with your end products and process stability in mind. What moisture control strategies have worked best in your thermal processing experience? I'd love to hear how others are approaching this fundamental parameter.

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages