CHANEL: The Last Great Independent – But for How Long? Yes, CHANEL remains one of the very few major luxury houses that is still independently owned — a true outlier in an industry shaped by consolidation. 👥 Ownership Privately held by the ultra-discreet Wertheimer brothers, Alain and Gérard, heirs to Coco Chanel’s original business partner. Their estimated combined net worth? Over $90 billion. Alain chairs the board. Gérard oversees watches. 🎯 Strategy & Leadership Since 2021, Leena Nair (ex-Unilever) has served as CEO, bringing a deeply human-centric lens to luxury. Chanel is investing heavily in sustainability, vertical integration, and customer experience. In 2024, Matthieu Blazy — of Bottega Veneta fame — took over as Artistic Director, bringing new creative energy after Virginie Viard. 🌀 But can Chanel remain untouched by industry shifts? • The resale boom (The RealReal, Vestiaire Collective) is altering consumer behavior. • LVMH and Kering are showing signs of slower growth. • Meanwhile, Hermès and Richemont are outperforming with a long-term, craftsmanship-first model. Which brings us back to the question: 💡 In a consolidating luxury world, might one of the Big Four look to take CHANEL off the independent shelf? Here’s the current landscape: • LVMH: Bernard Arnault called Chanel takeover rumors “fake news” — but never say never. Chanel would be the ultimate jewel in his crown. • Kering: Needs a spark. A Chanel deal would redefine its trajectory. • Richemont: Traditionally watch & jewelry-focused — but could Chanel offer fashion firepower? • Hermès: Quietly planning to enter haute couture by 2026. Could Chanel align with that ambition? 🎾 If the Wertheimers ever toss the CHANEL ball into play — who will catch it? #LuxuryStrategy #Chanel #LVMH #Kering #Hermès #Richemont #FashionIndustry #LuxuryResale #MergersAndAcquisitions #LeenaNair #MatthieuBlazy #Consolidation #Leadership #BrandLegacy
Harikrishnan Jalajakaran indeed, resale boom is also meantioned by Malte, along the main high-end fashion trends. 💡
The better question is who can afford it. Seemed like too big even for LVMH a few years ago.
Professor Malte, it’s not even 6:30 am and you’ve already got me deep in the biggest what if of luxury. Everyone always looks at LVMH or Kering when CHANEL’s future comes up — but if I had to place a bet, I’d go for Richemont or Hermès. Both have consistently shown they know how to preserve legacy, protect craftsmanship, and resist the temptation to over-commercialize. Honestly, some might argue Chanel’s bags aren’t quite what they were back in the ‘80s. Imagine what Hermès-level stewardship could do for the house — not just protecting its soul, but elevating its craft to new heights. Because at the end of the day, the most valuable thing in luxury isn’t what you can own. It’s what you know how to protect.
Chanel is a private company. It means no dividend distribtuted to capital markets. I’ll let you make the calculation for a company in billions of euros of Turn over, who has been making profits for the past 20 years and one of the highest level of preferability. This has to be divided by only 2 wertheimer brothers. They don’t need cash , they don’t need to sell.
What about Chanel acquiring one of the big four? I don’t believe they need or would do it but financially they are healthier than most on your list…
Chanel could technically be sold, but it won’t be. There were no restrictions in Coco Chanel’s will, but the Wertheimer family owns it outright and has zero interest in selling. They treat it like a legacy, not a listing. That’s what keeps it rare. Malte Karstan
Malte Karstan Fascinating crossroads for CHANEL, manoeuvre between independence and industry momentum. While it’s no surprise that CHANEL remains at the top of every acquisition wish list, staying autonomous in today’s hyper-fluid luxury landscape is both rare and admirable. But even legacy needs agility. To continue, the message and identity must flow down seamlessly along with the workforce quality. The challenge would be: 1. If it stays autonomous can the brand continue to redefine the industry. 2. For how long will it be able to stay independent and future relevant. 3. The brand will have to manoeuvre two fronts. Staying relevant and Staying Autonomous. That’s a lot of operational pressure. If they are eventually acquired, then the real debate would be: 1. Whether the brand's DNA will be withheld and aligned with the conglomerate dynamics, Without diluting its essence. Until then the boldest move is to evolve on your own terms, but at what price?
Thanks for sharing, Malte Great opportunity for whoever likes to try !!!
Malte Karstan CHANEL isn’t just the last great independent it’s the final myth standing. But myths don’t survive by resisting change; they evolve, or they fossilize. The question isn’t who could buy Chanel it’s whether Chanel still wants to be untouchable in a world where power lies in ecosystems, not isolation. If the Wertheimers ever let go, it won’t be for the money. It’ll be to rewrite luxury on their own terms one final masterstroke. Until then, Chanel remains the exception… and the temptation.
About CHANEL, when will people understand this isn't about money but purely about freedom? When you are wealthy, this is what truly matters... No reporting line, no shareholders' ego to manage. Only yours to self manage, which can be even tougher 😂 You can develop the same assumptions for Hermès, Patek Philippe or Audemars Piguet...