Why are institutions moving to stablecoins? It comes down to three things: speed, reach, and flexibility. Lauren Berta, Stablecoin Product Lead at Ripple, breaks down the shift in Crypto in One Minute. ⏱️ From real-time settlement to putting programmability in the hands of treasurers, see how stablecoins like RLUSD are evolving the way money moves.
institutions are moving to stablecoins not only for speed reach and flexibility but because they reduce uncertainty at the moment of settlement real time rails are powerful but the real question is whether execution is actually viable when a transaction is triggered especially across borders time zones and fragmented liquidity programmability gives treasurers control but execution awareness gives them confidence the next layer of institutional adoption will be about making settlement conditions visible not just faster stablecoins succeed when they dont just move money but move it at the right moment under the right conditions
Darrell I.
3w
Out of curiosity, do stable coins need to be future proof considering with the developments of quantum computers.
Institutions are optimizing for speed and programmability. QuantZen™ ensures these high-velocity, programmable payment rails remain quantum-safe as institutional adoption scales.
Desiree Moreno
1mo
Ripple…Leading the way🌊⛓️🔭🌌👏⭐️🏦💥
Roberto Verrillo
1mo
💪🔥
Sendo assim o token XRP perde o sentido.
Lauren Berta I would run as far from this position and company as possible. You can achieve the same settlement and payments efficiency through tokenized deposits, which are lawful and sit squarely within existing banking and supervisory frameworks. Stablecoins deliberately conflate blockchain technology with monetary authority, shifting the power to create money away from democratic oversight and into private hands. Stablecoins are unconstitutional, illegal, and functionally counterfeit money. Tokenized deposits are lawful financial infrastructure. Stablecoins are not.