Transcript

Imagine that if you were to go a mile or less, you would walk it, and if you were to go more than a mile, you would drive it. Paradoxically, you would go 2 miles quicker than you would go one mile. So that means that sometimes worse situations can be better than better situations. And this is an issue when if you only decide to act after you cross a certain threshold of badness or whatever, you can end up being stuck in region beta. So for instance, the friend that should leave his job really, really needs to leave his job. But it's just about. Possible, as Poss isn't that much of * ****. Maybe the benefits are OK or whatever. Or the person that's in a relationship with someone that they really don't want to stay with and it's not that brilliant, but it's not that bad. They don't abuse them, everything's OK. The person that stays in an apartment, it's got some mold on the scene. It's not too much mold in whatever. All of these people would be better off if the situations were worse because it would galvanize them into actually doing something. You understand what I mean? You can get stuck in this chasm of comfortable complacency that sits somewhere in the middle. If things are good, great, No problem. If things are bad, great activation energy to go and make them good. If things are just about passable, you end up being comfortably numb.