Balancing Speed, Trust, and Ownership: Lessons in Enduring Engineering Leadership by Kausal Malladi, INDmoney

In today’s technology landscape, engineering leadership is as much about mindset as it is about technical mastery. With over 14 years of experience building, scaling, and mentoring high-performing teams, our guest has navigated paradigm shifts from microservices to AI while balancing speed, resilience, and trust in some of the most demanding domains like BFSI. His journey reflects not just a commitment to robust architecture and metrics-driven culture, but also a deep belief in ownership, continuous learning, and human support systems.

Join Mr. Kausal Malladi, SVP & Head Engineering at INDmoney in an engaging conversation with Mr. Marquis Fernandes who spearheads the India Business for Quantic India. In this conversation, Kausal shares candid insights on balancing agility with resilience, instilling habits that define engineering excellence, designing trustworthy AI systems, and the personal lessons that shape him as both a leader and an individual.

Many engineering leaders emphasize speed of delivery versus system resilience. When you’re architecting for scale, how do you personally strike that balance without compromising either?

Balancing speed of delivery with system resilience is critical for building scalable software. My approach centers on iterative development paired with robust architectural foundations. For instance, in a four-week project, I break the problem into smaller, deliverable units, enabling weekly releases to validate both product impact and technical performance. By monitoring key metrics like latency and resource usage early on, we can iterate and refine designs as needed. However, this agility is underpinned by meticulous planning before execution begins. By prioritizing a strong architectural blueprint, focusing on modularity, scalability, and fault tolerance, we ensure that speed doesn’t come at the expense of reliability, delivering value quickly while maintaining long-term stability.

You’ve mentored teams from the ground up, what’s the one “early cultural habit” you always instill in new teams to set the foundation for long-term success?

I instill a metrics-driven mindset as the cornerstone of engineering excellence. Every line of code, every byte transferred over wire, and every network interaction, affects scalability and performance. Without visibility into these metrics, optimization is guesswork. From day one, I guide teams to instrument their code comprehensively, tracking latencies, infrastructure metrics, and system behavior. This habit transforms how engineers approach problem-solving, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Just as product managers obsess over funnel conversions, engineers should relentlessly pursue technical metrics, always wearing an “optimization hat” to drive software excellence.

In BFSI and other sensitive domains, AI integration often collides with regulation and trust. How do you design systems that are not just technically sound but also inspire stakeholder confidence?

In sensitive domains like BFSI, trust and compliance are as critical as technical excellence. My approach integrates security and regulatory requirements into every layer of the system design. From the outset, we align our architectures with industry standards, embedding security controls and compliance checks into the development process. By proactively addressing potential vulnerabilities and ensuring transparency in how data is handled, we build systems that not only perform reliably but also earn stakeholder trust. Regular audits, clear documentation, and collaboration with compliance teams further reinforce confidence, ensuring our solutions meet both technical and regulatory expectations.

With 14+ years of engineering leadership, you’ve witnessed multiple paradigm shifts in software development. Which shift micro-services, containerization, or AI, do you think will have the longest-lasting impact, and why?

Microservices architecture stands out for its enduring impact. Its core principles, decoupling components, maintaining separation of concerns, and enabling independent scaling, are foundational to modern software design, regardless of the technological paradigm. Whether integrating AI or leveraging containerization, microservices provide the flexibility and resilience needed to adapt to evolving demands. I’ve seen poorly designed systems become unmanageable without these principles, while well-executed microservices architectures remain robust and scalable over time. Their domain-agnostic nature makes them a bedrock for innovation, ensuring long-term relevance.

Click here to read the full article and explore the full journey of engineering leadership that goes beyond code.