Hot Take: Localization Isn’t Always Better (Our Multi-Market CRO Test)
by Ali DeMocker , VP of CRO at BMG360
Personalizing based on location sounds like a no-brainer...show people something that feels “local,” and they’ll convert more.
We ran a series of market-level CRO tests across multiple U.S. regions, Central Texas, Philadelphia, Southwest Florida for a national home services brand with dozens of service areas as part of a larger strategy to generate leads at scale across local markets.
The results were mixed. In some markets, local headlines and imagery worked. In others, performance flatlined or dropped, challenging a core assumption of modern marketing: that localization is always a positive lever.
The Test: Local Cues vs. Control
We A/B tested localization/geographic personalization at the landing page level. Each page had the same offer, with just a tweak in image and copy tone based on region.
What We Found:
And most other markets, there was no clear winner. So, the “personalized” version didn’t beat control.
Why Localization Sometimes Fails
Just because something’s local doesn’t mean it lands. We need to gradually test localization elements to see what works vs. what doesn't. But here are some reasons why it could fail:
How to Personalize Smarter
We're definitely not saying to stop localization altogether, but don’t assume it’s always better. Here’s how to use it with a performance marketing mindset:
Like everything in CRO, localization has to be tested, tracked, and tweaked by market, by creative, and by behavior.
Get in touch with Ali DeMocker if you want to talk localization and whether it's right for your brand!