When Inclusion Excludes: How Well-Intended DEIB Efforts Can Miss the Mark
Read on Culture Plus Blog
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) initiatives are now a staple in many organisations — and rightly so. But what if, despite our best intentions, these efforts are actually leaving people out?
Inclusion, after all, is not about ticking boxes or celebrating International Women’s Day once a year. It’s about ensuring everyone feels seen, valued, and able to thrive — every day. Yet, DEIB strategies can falter not because they’re ill-intentioned, but because they aren’t deeply inclusive by design.
Here’s how that happens — and what we can do about it.
1. One Size Doesn’t Fit All
Too often, DEIB programmes focus on one or two dimensions of diversity — say, gender or race — and miss the rest. While representation matters, focusing solely on visible differences can marginalise those with less obvious experiences: neurodiverse colleagues, LGBTIQA+ staff, older workers, or those from different socio-economic backgrounds.
“We talk about inclusion, but I don’t see my identity represented anywhere.”
True inclusion requires nuance. That means recognising that diversity is multi-dimensional — and so too must be our approach.
2. Performative Without Power
Celebrating Diwali or raising the rainbow flag during Pride Month can be meaningful symbols — but without structural change, they risk being performative.
If organisations aren’t listening to lived experience, shifting power structures, or addressing inequities in promotion and pay, the optics of inclusion can ring hollow.
“I was hired for my difference, but no one listens when I speak up.”
Belonging isn’t built through branding. It’s built through trust, equity, and accountability.
3. Alienating the Majority
Let’s be honest: if DEIB conversations make some employees feel like they no longer have a voice or that they’re part of the problem simply by being in the majority group — we’re doing it wrong.
Inclusion means everyone. If your messaging implies that some voices are now less valid, you risk resistance rather than allyship.
“I support inclusion, but it feels like I’m not welcome in the conversation.”
This doesn’t mean centring the majority. It means inviting them to be part of the change.
4. Ignoring Intersectionality
If your women’s leadership programme centres only the experiences of white, cisgender, able-bodied women, it’s not inclusive — it’s selective.
Intersectionality reminds us that identities overlap — and so do systems of bias. If our DEIB efforts fail to reflect that complexity, we end up reinforcing hierarchies within marginalised groups.
“I’m a woman too, but my lived experience isn’t reflected in these conversations.”
We must ask: whose stories are we amplifying — and whose are we leaving out?
5. No Voice, No Belonging
Employee voice is central to any inclusion strategy. Yet, too many DEIB programmes are created in boardrooms and rolled out without consulting the communities they aim to serve.
This top-down approach leads to initiatives that feel out of touch — or worse, alienating.
“They say it’s for us, but no one asked what we actually need.”
Belonging grows when people are part of the process, not just the audience.
6. Neglecting the Invisible
Let’s not forget the colleagues living with mental ill health, chronic illness, or neurodivergence — experiences that may not be immediately visible but are no less real.
If our policies and cultures assume that diversity always shows itself outwardly, we miss a huge part of the inclusion equation.
“Everyone talks about diversity, but no one understands the barriers I face.”
Silence doesn’t equal absence. Inclusion means seeking out what’s not said.
Final Thoughts: Check Your Inclusion for Gaps
If your DEIB efforts aren’t regularly asking who might feel excluded — you’re not doing DEIB work. You’re doing branding.
Inclusive practice is messy, complex, and ongoing. It takes humility to ask, “Who is this serving — and who is it not?” and courage to change course based on the answer.
Related Reading:
Love them all but especially number one- one size doesn’t fit all. To take a slightly different approach- All too often I see policy makers take the view that a neutral policy means it is inclusive. This is not the case. Neutrality does not = inclusivity.
💡 Great insight, thanks for sharing Felicity Menzies
Great piece Felicity Menzies
Yes this. So true. Love the last paragraph.
Thanks for sharing, Felicity. I can’t believe we have added another letter to DEI - that’s already misunderstood and slightly toxic. For example when did equality become equity and what on earth does that mean. You are right let’s stop looking at what divides us and look at what unites us! The straight white men and boy group are already starting to feel like the excluded ones. This is wrong and was never the intention. Young men are having an awful time making sense of the world, social media is creating confusion and what it even means to be a man. Just watch adolescence and understand incels. Wow its scary. How can we be here? We need to change the narrative