Why HR Still Has Trust Issues with AI and What to Do About It

Why HR Still Has Trust Issues with AI and What to Do About It

Let’s be honest—HR is tired of being told to “get on board” with AI. We’ve heard all the buzz about automation, predictive analytics, and digital transformation. But for most teams, AI adoption isn’t a sprint—it’s a maze. It's not that HR leaders don’t see the upside. The potential is obvious: faster hiring, smarter performance reviews, tailored employee development. But potential means nothing if you can’t get past the real blockers standing in the way.

AI in HR runs headfirst into three issues over and over again: not enough of the right skills, messy concerns about data privacy, and employees (sometimes leaders too) quietly resisting change. Each one creates drag. And if you're not prepared to deal with them, your AI initiative won't just stall—it’ll sink.

In this post, we’ll unpack those three friction points with practical context and credible research. You’ll hear what the iCIMS CHRO survey, Gartner, Deloitte, and Harvard Business Review have to say—and why it’s time to stop blaming the tech.


1. The Real Skills Gap Isn’t Technical but Translational

Ask any CHRO what’s holding back AI adoption, and you’ll hear the same thing: “We don’t have the skills.” But what skills are we really talking about? It’s not just Python or machine learning. It’s the ability to translate AI’s outputs into people decisions that actually stick.

This could be problematic. According to the recent iCIMS 2025 CHRO Report, 72% of CIOs plan to implement Agentic AI in the next 1-3 years. The same report cited six in 10 HR leaders say they’re using AI across the entire TA process. Top benefits include improved recruiter efficiency (30%), better scalability (30%), stronger compliance and security (29%) and enhanced DEI outcomes (29%).

But here’s the twist: it’s not always lack of knowledge. Sometimes it’s lack of application. We’ve built up armies of HR professionals trained in compliance, not experimentation. And it shows. Too many HR pros are afraid to get it wrong, so they don’t try.

What’s needed is a culture shift from “expert-driven” to “learning-led.” Upskilling needs to happen fast, but it doesn’t need to be fancy. LinkedIn Learning found that companies prioritizing upskilling are 92% more likely to innovate. Translation: Train your people to ask better questions of your AI tools—not to build them from scratch.

Need a starting point? See how AI can already support performance coaching in My Favorite AI Tool for Employee Coaching.


2. Data Privacy Is the Elephant in Every HR Tech Meeting

Cold hard fact: HR has more sensitive data than just about any other department. You’re managing everything from Social Security numbers to disciplinary records to salary history. Handing that over to an AI system? It makes even seasoned professionals squirm.

That anxiety is warranted. According to research published in Information Systems Research, privacy concerns can increase the odds of non-adoption of digital technologies by up to 26 times. And when it comes to HR, the stakes are even higher. A data breach isn’t just a tech problem—it’s a trust problem.

The deeper challenge here more about communication and less about compliance. Employees don’t need a lecture on GDPR nor would they listen to it or retain it. They need to know what data is being collected, why, and what the company will (and won’t) do with it. And they need to hear it in plain English, not legalese.

That’s where proactive transparency wins. Share your data policy before people ask. Let employees test the AI tools themselves. Invite skepticism—it shows you’re not hiding anything. According to Harvard Business Review, companies that earn internal trust with their data practices are more likely to gain adoption and avoid internal sabotage.

Looking to build better communication loops with stakeholders? You might also like The Importance of Hiring Manager Feedback, which tackles similar transparency challenges.


3. AI Won’t Take Your Job, But That Doesn’t Mean People Aren’t Scared

Even if the tech is solid and the privacy guardrails are clear, you’ll still hit resistance. Why? Because people don’t fear AI—they fear being irrelevant.

It’s human nature. According to McKinsey Global Institute’s “Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: What the Future of Work Will Mean for Jobs, Skills, and Wages”, by 2030, between 75 million and 375 million workers—roughly 3% to 14% of the global workforce—will need to switch occupational categories due to automation and AI-driven changes That kind of stat doesn’t inspire optimism—it triggers anxiety.

But the real challenge is how we talk about it.

Too often, AI is pitched as a replacement rather than a resource. Instead of saying “AI will do the admin,” leaders should be saying, “Here’s how this tool will free you up to do more strategic work.” Because when people understand the why, they’re more willing to support the how.

Real change happens when leaders connect dots between AI and the future of someone’s career—not just the company’s roadmap.


Final Thought

AI's integration in HR isn’t being held back by tech. It’s being held back by trust. Trust in the skills of the team. Trust in how data is handled. Trust that people still matter.

HR doesn’t need more dashboards. It needs more clarity. More candor. And above all, more courage to ask the hard questions before signing on to the next AI pilot. If you’re serious about making AI work for your HR team, start by tackling the friction. Not with big speeches—but with small wins. Upskill one team. Simplify your data policy. Talk to the doubters before rolling out your chatbot.

That’s how you build momentum—and a version of AI that actually sticks.


Article content


The gap between what AI can do and what HR trusts it to do is so real—and it won’t close without transparency, education, and real-world wins. Appreciate how you called out the need for more conversation and less blind adoption Trent Cotton

Like
Reply

I completely agree with this perspective. Currently, we're at a stage where AI has demonstrated its value, but humans still want to be involved in decision-making. I think we need to develop smaller, more accessible tools that help teams understand AI's capabilities and limitations, and then build upon that foundation. However, I strongly believe that 'Human-in-the-Loop' decision-making is essential. We need to strike a balance between leveraging AI's potential and ensuring that humans are still in control of critical decisions.

“enhanced DEI outcomes (29%).” I’m skeptical of this data point, Trent Cotton

Like
Reply

“Because when people understand the why, they’re more willing to support the how.” 1,000 times, YES!!!!

Tech rollouts often focus on functionality, but without trust, even the best tools stall. Building that trust early around data, intent, and roles makes all the difference in whether teams engage or resist. Trent Cotton

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Trent Cotton

Others also viewed

Explore content categories