I've watched 3 "revolutionary" healthcare technologies fail spectacularly. Each time, the technology was perfect. The implementation was disastrous. Google Health (shut down twice). Microsoft HealthVault (lasted 12 years, then folded). IBM Watson for Oncology (massively overpromised). Billions invested. Solid technology. Total failure. Not because the vision was wrong, but because healthcare adoption follows different rules than consumer tech. Here's what I learned building healthcare tech for 15 years: 1/ Healthcare moves at the speed of trust, not innovation ↳ Lives are at stake, so skepticism is protective ↳ Regulatory approval takes years usually for good reason ↳ Doctors need extensive validation before adoption ↳ Patients want proven solutions, not beta testing 2/ Integration trumps innovation every time ↳ The best tool that no one uses is worthless ↳ Workflow integration matters more than features ↳ EMR compatibility determines adoption rates ↳ Training time is always underestimated 3/ The "cool factor" doesn't predict success ↳ Flashy demos rarely translate to daily use ↳ Simple solutions often outperform complex ones ↳ User interface design beats artificial intelligence ↳ Reliability matters more than cutting-edge features 4/ Reimbursement determines everything ↳ No CPT code = no sustainable business model ↳ Insurance coverage drives provider adoption ↳ Value-based care is changing this slowly ↳ Free trials don't create lasting change 5/ Clinical champions make or break technology ↳ One enthusiastic doctor can drive adoption ↳ Early adopters must see immediate benefits ↳ Word-of-mouth beats marketing every time ↳ Resistance from key stakeholders kills innovations The pattern I've seen: companies build technology for the healthcare system they wish existed, not the one that actually exists. They optimize for TechCrunch headlines instead of clinic workflows. They design for Silicon Valley investors instead of 65-year-old physicians. A successful healthcare technology I've implemented? A simple visit summarization app that saved me time and let me focus on the patient. No fancy interface, very lightweight, integrated into my clinical workflow, effortless to use. Just solved an problem that users had. Healthcare doesn't need more revolutionary technology. It needs evolutionary technology that works within existing systems. ⁉️ What's the simplest technology that's made the biggest difference in your healthcare experience? Sometimes basic beats brilliant. ♻️ Repost if you believe implementation beats innovation in healthcare 👉 Follow me (Reza Hosseini Ghomi, MD, MSE) for realistic perspectives on healthcare technology
Key Considerations for Health Tech Startups
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Building a successful health tech startup is not just about innovative technology; it's about understanding the unique dynamics of the healthcare industry, where trust, integration, and patient outcomes take precedence over groundbreaking features.
- Prioritize building trust: Developing healthcare technology requires a strong foundation of trust, clinical validation, and clear communication about the benefits and safety of your product.
- Design for seamless integration: Make sure your solution fits smoothly into existing workflows and systems to encourage widespread adoption by healthcare professionals.
- Focus on solving real problems: Create technology that improves patient care and provider efficiency, rather than chasing flashy features or vanity metrics.
-
-
95% of healthtech startups don’t survive their first real market test. Not because of the product. Not because of funding. But because they misunderstood what the real test even is. Let me explain. Most founders think the test is: Will users try it? Can we grow fast? Does the product work? But in healthtech, the true test is this: Can the market trust you enough to use your product in a clinical workflow, at scale, without hand-holding? That’s where 95% of startups fail. Because healthcare doesn’t reward novelty. It rewards credibility, compatibility, and continuity. Here are 4 brutal truths I’ve learned after 25+ years in this space: 1. Healthcare doesn’t buy tech. It buys trust. Even if your ML model is 95% accurate, it won’t be adopted unless people trust how it works and why it works. If clinicians don’t understand it and decision-makers can’t defend it, they won’t risk patient care or reputations on it. 2. Pilots aren’t validation unless they prove real-world value. A controlled trial is only useful if it demonstrates measurable improvements - like saved clinician time, lower readmission rates, or better outcomes. Without that, it’s just a demo, not validation. 3. Integration beats innovation. If your product forces staff to log into a new system, learn new workflows, or switch between screens - it won’t scale. The best products blend into existing tools and workflows, not break them. 4. Good storytelling doesn’t secure funding. Proof does. You can impress with a flashy deck, but serious investors and clinical buyers want published studies, cost-benefit analyses, and evidence of adoption. Credibility beats charisma - every time. So if your startup fails at the first market test - it probably wasn’t bad tech. It was bad strategy. Too many teams build with optimism instead of realism. If you’re pre-launch or pre-scale, ask yourself: Who exactly will use this every day? Who will approve and pay for it? What will they stop doing once they adopt it? Healthtech isn’t about hacking growth. It’s about building trust - through data, design, and delivery. I’ve seen brilliant teams crash because they built for what should work - Not what actually gets used. You don’t need a better product. You need a better go-to-market reality check. Have you seen healthtech ideas die at the last mile? What caused the failure? #healthtech #founders #startups #innovation
-
So You Built a Digital Health Startup… Now What? Breaking into healthcare as an early-stage digital health company can feel like navigating a maze with no map. I was recently interviewed for a fireside chat with a startup incubator, and we tackled one of the biggest challenges—how to simplify this complex industry into actionable steps. After years in the trenches, I’ve learned that winning in healthcare isn’t just about having a great product. It’s about understanding the ecosystem, aligning incentives, and getting the right people on your side. Here are three key takeaways I shared with the group: 1. Know Your Customer & Economic Buyer Who uses your product, who pays for it, and who makes the decision? These are often three different people with completely different motivations. · Do you save them money? · Make them money? · Improve efficiency? · Do you have the clinical and economic data to prove it? If you can’t answer these questions, you might be selling to the wrong person. 2. Advocacy is Key to Market Entry No one wins in healthcare alone. You need stakeholders who believe in your solution and will push for its adoption. This influences everything—whether you go direct-to-consumer, B2B, physician-led, hospital-driven, or payer-backed. And if reimbursement isn’t in your corner, you’d better have a solid alternative strategy. 3. Follow the Competitive & Financial Landscape Pricing isn’t just about how much your product costs—it’s about how the healthcare system values it. · Who are your competitors? · How does money flow in your sector? · What financial incentives drive adoption? Understanding these levers is the key to scaling strategically (instead of just throwing money at the wall and hoping something sticks). I love helping companies navigate the twists and turns of this industry—because, let’s be honest, healthcare is never simple. But when you get it right, the impact is massive. What’s the best piece of advice you’ve ever received about launching in healthcare? Let’s hear it. #DigitalHealth #Startups #HealthcareInnovation #GoToMarket #HealthTech
-
Healthcare doesn't reward the best-built product. It rewards the best-aligned team: clinical, technical, and GTM - the triple threat most startups miss. If your founding team is heavy on engineering and light on lived experience inside hospitals, clinics, or payer orgs… you're building something that works in demos but dies in deployment. 90% of health tech startups fail not because their technology is bad, but because they never understood the problem they were solving. Too many teams fall into the same trap: ✅ Brilliant engineers ✅ Polished UI ❌ Zero clinical validation ❌ No strategy for 12-18 month buying cycles ❌ Missing clarity about the workflows or politics they're disrupting ❌ Misunderstanding about who their ICP actually is That last one kills deals before they start. You think you're selling to the CMIO, but the CFO holds the budget. You think the department head is your champion, but the frontline staff can torpedo implementation. You focus on the buyer while ignoring the end users who actually determine adoption. Here's what changes everything: 1️⃣ Clinical insight isn't optional - it's foundational. When clinicians are embedded early, you don't just build features. You build workflows that enhance care instead of creating more clicks. You catch the workflow breaks that engineers miss and uncover needs that only surface at 2 AM in the ICU. 2️⃣ GTM strategy can't be an afterthought. Healthcare buying isn't B2B - it's B2B2B2B. Your "user" (the nurse) isn't your buyer (IT director) isn't your budget holder (CFO) isn't your champion (CMO). Each has different pain points, decision criteria, and veto power. Map every stakeholder from day one. Identify who can say yes, who can say no, and who influences both. Build parallel relationships. That meeting coordinator you're ignoring? They might be your champion's most trusted advisor. 3️⃣ The winning formula: Clinical expertise shapes what you build. Technical excellence makes it scalable. GTM mastery gets it adopted. You can't afford to be great at just one. Healthcare demands all three working in lockstep. #HealthTech #GTMStrategy #ClinicalInsight #DigitalHealth #Founders
-
Healthcare startups have 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡 because they chase metrics instead of patient outcomes, and I nearly learned this the hard way. More than 4 years into building MedMatch Network, I thought faster growth meant better healthcare. BUT…. I was wrong. Dangerously wrong. ❌ We were scaling rapidly, adding practices weekly, celebrating user metrics that looked impressive on investor slides. But behind those numbers, patients were still falling through referral cracks, and providers were burning out from poorly designed workflows. The wake-up call came when a practice manager told me our platform added more confusion to her already chaotic day. We'd built technology for technology's sake, not healthcare's sake. 😥 That humbling moment forced me to rebuild our approach entirely. As a physician-founder, I had to remember that healthcare isn't just another industry - it's personal, regulated, and literally life-or-death. Real sustainable growth in healthcare requires precision, not just speed. You can't move fast and break things when the things are people's lives. 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐬: 📍Leverage technology to streamline patient care first, operations second 📍Prioritize patient experience because satisfied patients are your best retention strategy 📍Partner intentionally with clinicians who understand workflow realities, not just investors chasing metrics 📍Let clinical data guide decisions, not vanity metrics that look good in pitch decks 📍Most importantly, quality and compliance can never be afterthoughts In healthcare, cutting corners doesn't just hurt your business - it hurts people. 💔 Scaling healthcare technology right takes the precision of surgery itself. Every decision must serve the patient first, the business second. 💪🏻 P.S The most successful healthcare startups aren't the fastest - they're the ones that remember why they started. #healthcarestartups #digitalhealth #patientfirst #physicianfounder #medmatchnetwork
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Healthcare
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development