Running Remote reposted this
We’re not Forbes or The Washington Post… but honestly, this story would make Nick Bloom happy Velir just made a big move: they closed their Boston HQ and went remote-first. What I love about this decision is that it wasn’t driven by nostalgia. Or because collaboration apparently only happens under fluorescent lighting (Still waiting for data on that myth, btw.) No - they did what Brian Elliott keeps begging leaders to do: ignore leadership nostalgia, look at the data, and act like it’s 2026. Here is how Lisa B. (SVP People Ops) put it: “It came down to three things: data, logistics, and leadership alignment.” And we’re not exactly short on proof: - Remote workers are just as - if not more - productive (Stanford and Gallup have receipts) - Remote teams can communicate effectively (just look at Zapier - does this look like a communication-problem company?) - Innovation doesn’t drop (have you seen the latest Help Scout "delighting customers" campaign?) - Remote workers even sleep better - 29 more minutes per night on average, according to the Federal Reserve. The hesitation leaders feel? As Lisa puts it: “Most of the hesitation isn’t about remote work - it’s about stepping into the unknown.” And she nailed that one! I just wish more companies would test things, gather data, and listen — before deciding “remote doesn’t work” because Gary forgot to unmute once. Full interview with Lisa (in a Forbes-quality piece by Ana Maria Bennett) is in the comments. What remote-work myth do you wish leaders would stop repeating?