New Substack is live!!
This week I reflected on the topic of "epistemic atrophy," why our truth-seeking muscles feel weaker lately, and what studying philosophy taught me about rebuilding them.
When I was at University of Chicago, I took Intro to Metaphysics & Epistemology with Benjamin Callard, a class that made 19-year-old me think deeply about questions that felt just destabilizing enough to be interesting: What is knowledge? How do we know what we (seem to) know? What justifies belief?
What stayed with me, as I mention in my newsletter this week, wasn't any single argument, but the practice of inquiry itself - the reps, the friction, the discipline of sitting with a question longer than feels comfortable.
Somewhere along the way, that muscle started to weaken, and that's what I dive into in this edition. Today, search engines finish our thoughts, models complete our sentences, and feeds compress complexity into bite-sized certainty. It’s not that the answers are wrong, but it’s that they arrive before we’ve clarified what we’re even asking.
This week's issue covers all of the above plus:
- why thinking is relational (vs. individualistic)
- C.A.J. Coady's quietly radical idea that most knowledge is testimony
- how AI accelerates "epistemic atrophy"
- why all of this, in a roundabout way, led me to Goodword
I share a "Connection of the Week" - warm intro from Serena Dayal that brought Mia Park into my life a few years ago, and some photos from Mia's launch for Lazy (which, I've been loving).
I also share "One Good Thing" - hosting several webinars this week with amazing women in my life: Maria Pope, Lilli Donahue, and Katie Dunn.
If you’re interested in philosophy, connection, or how our tools shape the way we think, I think you’ll enjoy this one. Link in comments.
Would love to hear what you think!!